Whisky Review
FirstPreviousReturn to ListNextLast
#390  Canadian Mist NAS Blended Canadian
This cost is what I found the likely shelf price for a 750ml bottle to be, based on an average of costs throughout the USA. Your price may differ significantly. This is not an advertisement of sale, this bottle is likely empty by now anyway Cost$1500Bottle Image. Image is © Practical Whisky. Bottle, logo and other trademarked imagery are © their respective owners.
00-09:Horrid
10-19:Awful
20-29:Unpleasant
30-39:Poor
40-49:Below Average
50-59:Average
60-69:Recommendable
70-79:Very Good
80-89:Excellent
90-99:Fantastic
Taste Score
    24                 
The whisky's score as weighed against the cost of a bottle. Adj. Score
    24                 
ABV40%
AwardsNo Medals Awarded
Tasting # 422: Canadian Mist: blue label  (05-MAR-2010)
NotesAs of this tasting, Canadian Mist's older Link to another review Orange Label version has my least favorite Canadian Whisky of all time, sitting at the very bottom of my overall taste list for four solid years. Now, thanks to my new label = new review rule, I get to drink it again. Yikes. The fact that I picked this up as a one-buck mini is small comfort, I'm subjecting you to another dreary review of this repackaged horror. Because of that, I'm tossing this in on a Friday instead of the normal weekly review. I simply cannot imagine that this is anything but a new label (someone realized that mist isn't orange, I guess) of junk whisky. Sorry, but this stuff was miserable last time and if anyone at Canadian Mist reads this, I hate your whisky. You'll just have to console yourself by watching those truckloads of Canadian Dollars backing up to your headquarters.
1st
Impression
There's no path to objectivity here, but I will say the label is easier on the eyes.
SmellUnbelievably sweet rye and raisins. Very sharp when you get down into the glass. Not as horrible as I remember, at least.
TasteUgh. I almost thought there was hope, but this is just bad whisky. I don't know if I can completely justify the old sub-20 score on this, but it's certainly an unpleasant pile of rye-tartness. There's nothing especially horrid up front, but the sandpaper attack of rye at the peak makes up for it and then some. Sour fade and so on and so on and nevermind. Ugh, just no. Really unhappy with this almost through the entire finish. To it's credit, it ends reasonably well, too bad you have to suffer through the actual... well, drinking part. I'm going to bump the score above 20 only because I now know where the depths of whisky truly lay, but don't take it as an improvement.
Tasting Score24
Comments
No Comments Yet!

Leave a comment quickly, before time runs out!!! (Note: time not currently running out)
You are
Email
(not shown)
Your Icon
&/or Score
/100
Your 2 ¢
Post Tips

You Might Should Know

and other caveats and disclaimers

Posting here and clicking through this means you've essentially agreed to play by the rules of my sandbox. Your options are to agree or to not post.

That said, there is but one rule: I decide what stays and what goes.

Promising nothing, I intend to leave any posts that are on topic and civil, I intend to delete anything else and I will ban anyone who abuses the system without warning. I'm not trying to be a jerk here and I'm not moderating for opinions or even attitudes, stay on target and we'll get along fine.

Clicking [Agree] will set a small cookie so you'll never see this again. All submissions will be tracked by IP address.

Brian.
Admin Edit, you don't have access to this